6/13/13

Revolutionary approach to Decision Making

I assure the reader that I am not going to propound a complex theory I came across in management circles. One of the worst investments I ever made in life was to buy a book called "decision making" .
It was utterly useless - not only did I spend a good amount of time trying to understand the parameters , I didn’t find one useful place in life where I could apply it !
Ever since then , I have been trying to figure out a way to simplify the PROCESS of decision making , and here are my thoughts on the same ..

Taking a life changing decision is a painful process (much more painful than living by a decision you made !) . Usually , when we have to take a decision within a fixed time , we  walk around with the heavy burden on our shoulders , brooding , taking advice from people , and yet not fully satisfied with most of the advice .
And even though we get good practical advice (hopefully) , in the end we end up doing our own thing . And later in life , we may sit and ponder -why did I take so and so decision ?

 I propose here the approach I took personally to take one of the major decisions in my life .

  1. One needs to have a clear cut choice between various options available - ie - I should either stick to choice A , B or C .
  1. Identify the factors on which to base  your decision.
  2. Break down the main factors into sub set of criteria - this is very important . You need to know what criteria to base the decision on . Society places a lot of importance on "practicality and future planning" . Often , we are advised to "not be emotional" while taking a decision.
                   I disagree . For a wholesome individual , emotional satisfaction cannot be sidelined just because
                   other factors are "practical"
  1. Based on the criteria , give a personal weightage (numerical value 1-10) to either A,B or C . I stress on the "personal " part because no matter how much advice u get from anyone - you and only you can determine the weightage YOU give to a criteria .
  2. Add up the weightages and whatever option has the highest weightage , go for it !


An  example:
Confusion :
Should I stay in a PG or stay in a rented room with friends ?


Factor 1 : Financial and logistics


Weightage to PG
Weightage to rented room
Costwise , PG is cheaper

3

If I stay in a room , I need to take care of domestic issues like cleaning , cooking etc

5

My parents etc can come and visit if I stay in a room


4


Factor 2 :Emotional


Weightage to PG
Weightage to rented room
I can stay with friends


9
Freedom to come and go as I choose


7
I may feel safer in a PG (more company)

4


Conclusion :
Total PG weightage = 3+5+4 = 12
Total Room weightage = 4+9+7 = 20

Rented room wins , no questions asked !


One of the best advantages with this approach is that - I can actually  document the major decisions of my life !!
I am assured in my mind that I take a logical approach to take decisions (logical , not "practical" , which means I account appropriately for emotional factors ) . And years later in life , if I choose to , I can trace back and re assure myself that whatever I decided was purely logical to me at that point of time :)

One of my friends came up with a profound thought when I described this complicated procedure  " You would have already decided in your mind . All these processes are only to bring it out and justify your decision" !!
My purpose of putting this out in my blog is a hope that it helps others "decide how to decide" !!!
I would love to hear feedback and comments , and know whether this is as useful to others as it is to me :)


-Deepika

1 comment:

  1. Just for the sake of commenting

    A book may atmost provide a set of guidelines and a set of rules that worked for that author.
    Out of all the parameters suggested some might work / none might be applicable.
    'One size fits all' least works.

    They say each set of rules are to be custom made by each individual depending on the eco-system the individual resides.
    As a result each set of rules shall be different and it's best when one architects his/her own set of rules.
    As the individual knows better how aggressive or redundant or how to break the rules / abide by the rules.

    Leaders architect new paths and sheep's follow it.
    A leader and sheep in us does both. One out of these two qualities shall dominate.

    Probably a better question in this well thought and written article would be to ask the readers
    "What set of rules would they architect for better decision making and are they happy with their design?"

    ReplyDelete